Courts could strap electronic devices on 10-year-olds without asking their parents under Queensland’s latest youth crime crackdown.
Ankle monitors could be fitted on children as young as 10 under proposed Queensland laws.
The bill would allow courts to issue electronic monitoring devices to any youth granted bail in the state and remove the need for consent from the parent or child.
Youth Justice Minister Laura Gerber introduced the new laws in parliament on Wednesday.

“It allows for electronic monitoring to be statewide, it is no longer limited by geographic location and it means that any youth who is granted bail can be given electronic monitoring,” Youth Justice Minister Laura Gerber said at a press conference.
“We promised Queenslanders we would continue to strengthen our youth crime laws, and that’s exactly what we are doing,” she said.
“Under Adult Crime, Adult Time, youth offenders now face serious consequences for their actions, and these reforms are another step to reduce reoffending and victim numbers.”

The Adult Crime, Adult Time law was introduced last year and allows juvenile offenders to be given adult sentences for serious crimes, including murder and robbery.
Ms Gerber said the legislation is “cleaning up Labor’s mess” and will “make Queensland safer and reduce the number of victims of crime”.

Youth Advocacy Centre chief executive Katherine Hayes told the ABC she is sceptical about how the monitor rollout would work but still prefers kids being given a device over spending time in youth detention.
“The big challenge with electronic monitoring devices is having a safe, stable home where the device can be charged each night,” she said.
Ms Hayes said she would prefer children provide consent and pointed out that the devices require 4G phone and internet to function properly.
“If the child doesn’t charge it or keep it connected to 4G, they’re in breach of their bail conditions and can be liable to be returned to detention,” she said.
“But we still think that electronic monitoring devices are better than detention.”
The Youth Justice (Electronic Monitoring) Amendment Bill 2025 will be examined in 2026, where parliament will debate the changes.
What Are the Broader Implications for Electronic Monitoring?
Electronic monitoring continues expanding across criminal justice, with GPS ankle bracelet improvements — multi-week battery, zero false-alarm tamper detection, cellular dead zone elimination — removing operational barriers to program growth.
Research supports effectiveness: Florida DOC documented 31% recidivism reduction with GPS ankle monitor supervision; pretrial programs report 85-95% court appearance rates; DV monitoring shows 50-70% reductions in repeat violations. Combined with 70-95% cost savings versus incarceration, these outcomes drive legislative expansion of electronic monitoring alternatives across pretrial, probation, parole, and specialized supervision programs nationwide.
What Special Considerations Apply to Juvenile Electronic Monitoring Programs?
Juvenile GPS ankle monitor programs require age-appropriate technology — lighter devices under 120g, discreet designs for school attendance, smartphone alternatives reducing social stigma, and compliance with JJDPA and state juvenile confidentiality statutes.
Device form factor is critical for juvenile compliance. Ultra-lightweight GPS ankle bracelet devices (108g class) minimize skin irritation during active lifestyles and are easier to conceal under school clothing, reducing the social stigma that drives non-compliance in adolescent populations. Extended battery life reduces the supervisory burden on parents who must ensure device charging — a particularly important factor when juvenile monitoring success depends on family engagement.
Privacy protections for juvenile electronic monitoring data are substantially stricter than adult programs. FERPA governs school information sharing, state confidentiality statutes limit data disclosure, and COPPA considerations apply to app-based monitoring features. Agencies implementing juvenile GPS ankle monitor programs must ensure their technology platforms support these enhanced data protection requirements.