Practical guides for deploying and managing electronic monitoring programs
Two comprehensive GPS ankle monitor guides published in 2026 cover technology fundamentals, procurement evaluation criteria, vendor comparisons, and cost analysis for corrections agencies and criminal justice professionals.
Most requests for proposals (RFPs) for electronic monitoring and GPS ankle monitor programs still wave at “NIJ compliance” the way older solicitations once waved at “best commercial practices”—as a phrase…
The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) and related federal summaries have long framed the scale of community supervision: in 2018, an estimated 4.4 million people were on probation or parole…
GPS accuracy is often quoted by ankle monitor manufacturers as a single number—typically 2 to 10 meters.
The landscape of offender supervision and secure environment management is currently characterized by a fundamental dichotomy: highly specialized system...
A recent case out of Hamilton County, Ohio, where a supervisee allegedly removed a court-ordered electronic monitoring device, spotlights a persistent c...
A recent, somber report out of Pittsburgh underscored a persistent, troubling question within community supervision: what happens when electronic monito...
Electronic monitoring has become a cornerstone of community supervision across the United States, offering an alternative to incarceration while maintai...
A tragic incident in Namyangju, Gyeonggi Province, South Korea, reveals a critical breakdown in electronic monitoring protocols.
In the field of offender supervision, electronic monitoring (EM) has long been hailed as a versatile tool, offering a pathway for individuals to reinteg...
Electronic monitoring for youth offenders is an expanding practice in community supervision globally.
The landscape of electronic monitoring (EM) for community supervision is currently experiencing a profound transformation.